top of page

ABOUT US

One day everyone will get the idea

OUR VISION

Redefining the Way 
We Create Technology - Where Privacy Isn’t a Feature. It’s a Foundation!

“Three years ago, I deleted an app I’d used daily for months. Not because it didn’t work, but because I finally read the privacy policy. The realisation that I’d been the product, not the customer, stayed with me.

 

The Hyam Institute exists because that feeling shouldn’t be normal. We’re a team of developers who believe you deserve apps that work for you - apps that don’t track your every move, sell your information, or manipulate your behaviour.

​

Every decision we make starts with one question: 'Is this in our users’ best interest?'

That’s not just marketing - it’s how we build.

​

We’re proving you don’t have to choose between great functionality and your privacy."

 

Rupert Wilkey - Team Principal | Hyam Institute

Rupert Wilkey - Team Principal

"By not trying, I will have already failed."

Are you fed up with your apps suggesting: 

  • Random people they think you might know?

    • Surely you know who your friends are?

  • Products they thought you'd like?

    • This proves they are monitoring what you view and click on.​

  • Sponsored sites or pages for you?

    • Again, this proves they are monitoring what sites you visit.​​

Building Technology for Human Flourishing: A Vision for Ethical Innovation

Our vision and principles represent a fundamental shift from the extractive, engagement-driven models that have dominated the tech industry toward a more human-centred and socially responsible approach.

Core Principles and Values

Mission-Driven Development

Our emphasis on addressing real-world challenges like health, housing, food security, and social crises directly tackles the most pressing issues of our time. This approach ensures technology development has a tangible, measurable impact on human wellbeing.

Rejecting Extraction Economics

The transition away from surveillance capitalism and behavioural profiling represents a crucial paradigm shift. By refusing to treat users as products to be monetised through attention harvesting, we are championing digital dignity and autonomy.

Balanced Success Metrics

Expanding success criteria beyond quarterly growth and engagement to include social and environmental impact creates a more holistic framework for evaluating technological progress.

Implementation Considerations

Speed vs. Quality Balance

We want to maintain rapid development cycles without compromising:

Thorough testing and validation.

Community input and feedback loops.

Accessibility standards.

Security protocols.

Sustainable Funding Models

We reject extraction-based revenue, instead exploring alternative models:

Subscription services with transparent value propositions.

Public-private partnerships for social good initiatives.

Impact investment from aligned capital sources.

Cooperative ownership structures.

Algorithmic Transparency Framework

Our call for algorithmic transparency is crucial:

Open-source algorithm components where possible.

Plain-language explanations of how recommendations work.

User control panels for algorithm preferences.

Regular algorithmic audits for bias and fairness.

Expanding the Vision

Community Governance

We want to incorporate democratic decision-making processes where communities have input on feature development and policy changes affecting them.

Interoperability Standards

We promote open standards and protocols that prevent platform lock-in and enable user data portability across services.

Global South Considerations

Our approach addresses the specific needs and contexts of developing regions, avoiding technological subjugation and exploitation while promoting local innovation.

The Path Forward

Our principles align with emerging movements in digital rights, ethical AI, and sustainable technology. This framework serves as a foundation for:

  • Industry standards and certification programs.

  • Policy advocacy and regulatory frameworks.

  • Educational initiatives for developers and designers.

  • Investment criteria for impact-focused funding.

The technology industry needs more organisations committed to these principles. By implementing them consistently and transparently, we can demonstrate that profitable, scalable technology and social good are not mutually exclusive.

The Hyam Institute was named in remembrance of

Professor Ronald Hyam

1936 - 2025

Ronald started his academic career as an undergraduate at St John's College, Cambridge, where he matriculated on 1 November 1956 and studied for the Historical Tripos.

He then joined Magdalene College in October 1960 as a College Lecturer in History. Ronald became an Official Fellow in History in 1962, serving until 2000, and thereafter, an Emeritus Fellow.

He devoted six decades to Magdalene College and served as College Librarian from 1963 to 1993, Admissions Tutor from 1980 to 1982, Acting President in 1992-93, Deputy President in 1994, and President from 1996 to 1998. From 2000 to 2018, he served as the College Archivist, preserving an invaluable record of Magdalene’s history. His exceptional contribution was recognised through his appointment as Archivist Emeritus, which reflects his long and dedicated service.

Professor Hyam was one of Cambridge University's leading historians and is remembered with deep affection for his formidable intellect, keen sense of humour, and warmth of spirit. His influence on generations of students, colleagues and Fellows leaves an enduring legacy.

bottom of page